|
|
Post by spoons on Nov 2, 2021 20:25:35 GMT 1
They’ve been swapped over then
She is a very well respected official by all accounts
|
|
|
|
Post by spoons on Nov 2, 2021 23:36:35 GMT 1
This will test the facilities having a female ref. Looks like the physio room will be use then  |
|
|
|
Post by didier on Nov 3, 2021 18:16:28 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by frog12345 on Nov 4, 2021 14:23:11 GMT 1
Wonder who will be the tv pundits, my crap tv magazine reckons Mark Pougatch presenting, but surely that's a conflict of interest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harold on Nov 4, 2021 14:24:59 GMT 1
Ian Wright and Grant Hoult were mentioned somewhere else I remember seeing.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianb on Nov 4, 2021 20:56:54 GMT 1
Ian Wright and Grant Hoult were mentioned somewhere else I remember seeing. Per a tv listing Banbury United v Barrow (Kick-off 5.15pm). Mark Pougatch presents all the action from the first-round tie at Spencer Stadium. Southern League outfit Banbury reached this stage for the first time in their history last season, and have repeated the feat following a 1-0 win over Bath City, but they face a tough test against the Bluebirds, who earned promotion to League Two in the 2019/20 campaign, and retained their Football League status last season. With analysis from Grant Holt and Ian Wright, commentary by Seb Hutchinson and Adam Virgo, and reports from Gabriel Clarke |
|
|
|
Post by ianb on Nov 4, 2021 20:58:34 GMT 1
The listing people clearly have not looked back into our history by stating qualified for the first round first time last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by geoff95 on Nov 5, 2021 23:05:47 GMT 1
Sudbury v Colchester. Exactly what we don't want. Sudbury level 8 agreed, but we don't want such a one sided game which only ever had one outcome. Come On You Reds
|
|
Kjt
Full Member
Posts: 241
|
Post by Kjt on Nov 6, 2021 22:26:39 GMT 1
Shame it hand to end in a 4-0 whooping but you could tell the difference in professionals and part time.
A real pity about the small selection of morons that decided it was acceptable to boast about and sing about a certain persons wrong doings, I wish someone would educate them, disgusting!
|
|
|
|
Post by petet on Nov 6, 2021 23:14:07 GMT 1
Fair play to Barrow, they were far too good for us. They were quicker and stronger.
We have had a great run, and there is no disgrace in losing to a professional outfit.
Good luck to them in the next round.
|
|
|
|
Post by spoons on Nov 6, 2021 23:17:02 GMT 1
Proud of the team today. But they was far better in all areas. 15 ran the first half.
We have a very good side for the division we play in, bounce back Tuesday to show what a good team we are.
Lots of hard work by many volunteers over the past few weeks, well done all of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sparky on Nov 6, 2021 23:45:58 GMT 1
A step too far for us at the moment against a well organised much quicker side. The scoreline was a bit harsh on us but can’t have any complaints. The upside is the money in the bank which will hopefully help us to push on for promotion which will now be the focus. Just a mention about the idiots throwing smoke flares, they may not be aware but some of the money made will probably now have to pay an FA fine, well done morons.
|
|
|
|
Post by spiritof86 on Nov 7, 2021 0:03:37 GMT 1
A step too far , Barrow deserved their win but not by 4 goals , United fans were fantastic and a few pyrotechnics added to the occasion.
The league and the trophy to concentrate on
|
|
|
|
Post by geoff95 on Nov 7, 2021 0:09:41 GMT 1
3 leagues difference showed. Barrow deserved their win and were the better team. Some seriously arrogant sh**s on their forum though. 3 leagues difference guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sparky on Nov 7, 2021 0:21:32 GMT 1
A step too far , Barrow deserved their win but not by 4 goals , United fans were fantastic and a few pyrotechnics added to the occasion. The league and the trophy to concentrate on In case you were unaware pyrotechnics are supposed to be banned in football grounds and as for adding to the occasion, nothing more than stupidity which will cost the club an FA fine. |
|
